Takeaways dari Wawancara Departemen Ghislaine Maxwell-Justice | Politik berita

Takeaways dari Wawancara Departemen Ghislaine Maxwell-Justice | Politik berita

  • Panca-Negara
Takeaways dari Wawancara Departemen Ghislaine Maxwell-Justice | Politik berita

2025-08-23 00:00:00
Departemen Kehakiman pada hari Jumat merilis transkrip yang telah lama ditunggu-tunggu dari wawancara yang berumur beberapa minggu yang dilakukannya dengan jeffrey Epstein yang dihukum Ghislaine Maxwell.

Donald Trump Federal agencies See all topics Facebook Tweet Email Link Link Copied!

Follow The Justice Department on Friday released the long-awaited transcripts of a weeks-old interview it conducted with convicted Jeffrey Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell.

The Maxwell interview was one of two steps the White House took to try and quell outrage over its handling of the Epstein files, which has rocked the administration for weeks and caused even many supporters of President Donald Trump to balk.

Attorney General Pam Bondi and other officials had built up anticipation for the Epstein documents before pulling back on promises to release them.

Trump has also made a series of false and misleading claims that have caused Epstein’s victims to suggest a cover-up.

The administration’s other big move – asking to unseal grand jury testimony – hasn’t amounted to much.

In fact, two judges have suggested it was a “diversion” intended to look transparent without actually being so.

The Maxwell interview conducted by Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, likewise, doesn’t add much to the public knowledge of Epstein.

But there are some key points worth running through – particularly in the broader context of the administration’s botched handling of the matter.

Here’s what to know from the transcript: Maxwell isn’t coming clean, which undercut the exercise The Maxwell interview is the administration’s first significant release of information since its effort to close the matter blew up in its face last month.

(Also on Friday, it sent Epstein documents to a House committee that had demanded them, but those aren’t public yet.) But it was always a weird choice, given Maxwell is a convicted sex offender and her appeals are ongoing.

The Justice Department in Trump’s first term also labeled her a brazen liar.

What could she possibly add of value?

Not a whole lot, it seems.

Related article This undated trial evidence image obtained December 8, 2021, from the US District Court for the Southern District of New York shows British socialite Ghislaine Maxwell, right, and US financier Jeffrey Epstein, left.

US District Court for the Southern District of New York READ: Transcript of the Justice Department’s interview with Ghislaine Maxwell The big headlines are that Maxwell doesn’t implicate anybody – including Trump – in any wrongdoing and says Epstein didn’t have a client list.

But those statements might carry more weight if Maxwell came clean about her and Epstein’s own misdeeds.

She clearly didn’t do that.

In fact, she repeatedly cast doubt on them, too.

She denied that Epstein paid her millions of dollars to recruit young women for him.

She denied witnessing any nonconsensual sex acts.

And she denied seeing anything “inappropriate” from “any man” – seemingly including Epstein.

“I never, ever saw any man doing something inappropriate with a woman of any age,” Maxwell said.

“I never saw inappropriate habits.” Some other Maxwell responses also call her credibility into question.

In another instance, Maxwell claimed Epstein didn’t have “inappropriate” cameras inside his New York, Caribbean, New Mexico and Paris residences.

Cameras in his Palm Beach, Florida, house were used because money was being stolen.

But Epstein’s seven-story townhouse in Manhattan was outfitted with cameras, the New York Times reported earlier this month.

Several of Epstein’s victims have cited a network of hidden cameras.

In another instance, Maxwell indicated she didn’t recall recruiting a masseuse from Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort – seemingly denying Virginia Giuffre’s claim that that’s where Maxwell recruited her.

“I’ve never recruited a masseuse from Mar-a-Lago for that, as far as I remember,” she said.

But the next day, Maxwell made a point to water down that denial.

“I don’t remember anybody that I would have [recruited],” Maxwell said.

“But it’s not impossible that I might have asked someone from there.” If Maxwell wasn’t about to come clean about her own crimes, should we really have expected her to shed light on anything else?

Her answer on Epstein’s suicide is likely to spur further questions While the interview didn’t shed much light, in one way it’s likely to fuel more questions.

On one key point, Maxwell aligned at least in part with those who have lodged conspiracy theories about Epstein, who died by suicide.

“I do not believe he died by suicide, no,” Maxwell said.

Maxwell was asked to speculate on who might have killed Epstein, and she said she didn’t know.

Maxwell did break from many of the theories about Epstein’s death, in that she said she didn’t believe he was killed because he was blackmailing people.

Instead, she suggested it could have been an attack unrelated to that.

“In prison, where I am, they will kill you or they will pay – somebody can pay a prisoner to kill you for $25 worth of commissary,” Maxwell said.

“That’s about the going rate for a hit with a lock today.” Video Ad Feedback Prison consultant: Maxwell's prison move "unprecedented" 4:54 - Source: Berita Prison consultant: Maxwell's prison move "unprecedented" 4:54 Blanche seemed to take care to emphasize that distinction, repeatedly returning to it.

The administration has said that Epstein did die by suicide, but the information it has offered – including a jailhouse video – has led to questions about how definitive its proof is.

Maxwell has obvious credibility problems and wouldn’t necessarily have any unique insight into how Epstein died.

(She said she never called or visited him in jail.) But a recent poll showed Americans said 60%-12% that the government was “hiding information” about Epstein’s death.

And now Epstein’s top accomplice apparently told the government it’s wrong, for whatever that’s worth.

She made a point to flatter Trump One of the big questions in the runup to the interview was whether Maxwell was using it to try and win concessions from the Trump administration – and was tailoring her testimony accordingly.

Her lawyer, David Markus, spent the weeks prior often saying nice things about Trump and even suggesting a possible pardon or legal intervention in her ongoing appeals.

Maxwell was also recently moved to a lower-security prison camp that she, as a sex offender, doesn’t appear eligible for without a waiver.

The administration still hasn’t explained how that happened, weeks later.

And Maxwell’s testimony doesn’t exactly refute that she wants something from Trump.

At one point, she took a brief diversion to offer unsolicited praised of his political success.

Related article Annie Farmer, an Epstein accuser, appears on Berita on Thursday.

Berita Epstein victims are a growing political threat to Trump “I just want to say that I find – I – I admire his extraordinary achievement in becoming the president now,” Maxwell said.

“And I like him, and I’ve always liked him.” Trump has also said nice things about Maxwell, including bizarrely wishing her well – repeatedly – after she was charged in 2020.

He also repeatedly left open the possibility of pardoning her around the time she interviewed with Blanche, who is Trump’s former personal attorney.

Blanche told Maxwell she had limited immunity for the interview, but he also said, “I’m not promising to do anything” for her.

Names were named, and Maxwell rebuts Trump When the Justice Department said last month that it wouldn’t release more information, it cited a desire not to impugn people who haven’t been charged with crimes.

Trump himself has repeatedly cited a desire to avoid doing that, including as recently as Friday afternoon.

But notably, the administration now appears to have relaxed that standard.

The transcripts redact only the names of victims and leave in the names of well-known people broached by Maxwell and Blanche.

That includes not only Trump and former President Bill Clinton, but also Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F.

Kennedy Jr., Harvey Weinstein, a former congressman and plenty of others.

Maxwell mentioned some men getting massages but didn’t implicate anyone in wrongdoing.

She explicitly said she had never observed Trump getting a massage.

Of Clinton, she said: “I don’t believe he did.” Of Kennedy, she said, “I never saw anything inappropriate with Mr.

Kennedy.” She also appeared to rebut one of Trump’s oft-stated claims about Epstein – that the 42nd president was actually closer to him than Trump was.

Trump has repeatedly claimed Clinton went to Epstein’s island dozens of times – as many as 28.

But that appeared to rest on a complete misreading of the available information.

And Maxwell said Clinton never once visited the island.

“He never [did],” Maxwell said.

“Absolutely never went.

And I can be sure of that because there’s no way he would’ve gone – I don’t believe there’s any way that he would’ve gone to the island had I not been there.” But again, Maxwell’s crimes call her testimony into question.

While she denied seeing any man engage in inappropriate acts, she has in fact been convicted of participating in one man’s: Epstein’s.

Donald Trump Federal agencies See all topics Facebook Tweet Email Link Link Copied!

Follow

  • Viva
  • Politic
  • Artis
  • Negara
  • Dunia